Ucl or lse. UCL is great too though but has less of a prestige factor.
Ucl or lse For more information on additional costs for prospective students and Hey everyone, I find myself facing a pretty tough choice these days: Oxford VS UCL Now first of all to my general situation: I am an international student and have applied to both for deferred entry to do a gap year and received offers from both (Oxford E&M, UCL Econ L100). IDK man, I’m sure both are equally prestigious but LSE I think is different gravy- probably just personal perception (excuse the alliteration). King’s law March, UCL in April, LSE in May. Focusing on the courses itself and uni life, Oxbridge UCL and LSE don't do War Studies, so KCL attracts the highest level of candidate and academic in the WORLD. Great opportunities to meet and talk to people Social life: ucl >>> lse I was always told that people in ucl are more outgoing and willing to organise a variety of soc activities. LSE is 3As excluding Further Maths, UCL is 3As including Maths. I'm an international student wanting to reach a master degree in the U. UCL and LSE are both wonderful institutions. all the best! Reply reply UCL vs LSE and Oxbridge for Economics 🎓 UNI / UCAS I know UCL is one of the best universities in the world but I wanted to know how it compares to LSE and Oxbridge for Economics specifically, eg. Reply 13. I have been reading about rankings, forums and reviews, but I would nonetheless greatly appreciate any guidance or opinion you could give on Do not get me wrong, LSE is a fantastic university; but when you compare it with UCL, I do not think that LSE would beat UCL. Personally for me it is UCL bc of its international ranking but int ranking are often useful for graduates not undergrads. Basically, I've received three offers so far: one from Durham (MSc Peace, Conflict Resolution and Security), LSE (MSc Public Policy and Administration), and UCL (MSc Public Policy) and I am quite stuck concerning where to go. They’re both regularly ranked among the top ten (and often five!) universities in the UK. LSE's campus experience and student life was less fulfilling, but I can imagine it would be perfect for Master's/PhD. Ultimately it comes down to preference. UCL is my top choice, and has been for a while. O study at LSE and it is academically well known and its always top 5 UK and is the only social science specialist university in the world that is up there. If your friend loves the interaction between money and the places it concentrates in, then LSE is an excellent choice. Kings at 5. LSE has a slightly better reputation but I don't think this is the case for law. . Probably I will compare the events which you told me between UCL and LSE for taking a decision. I've had comments from interviewers that i UCL vs LSE UCL vs LSE. I already accepted the offer and paid the deposit of £4000 because I figured I wouldn‘t hear back from LSE. It is now between LSE and UCL for my last spot. New. I have applied to LSE, UCL and Cambridge in the UK. Rankings like the CUG are UCL Economics 2024 Applicants; University with bad GCSES; LSE KCL UCL Law LLB 2024; Cambridge PBS Applicants 2022; UCL, LSE OR KCL for law? Is it worth me applying to KCL OR UCL WITH AAB; Why KCL is so overrated? LSE, KCL, UCL or ICL; Do I have a competitive application for Law 2025? Neuroscience 2023; UCL vs LSE vs KCL Politics IR UCL’s main teaching locations are in zones 1 (Bloomsbury) and zones 2/3 (UCL East). I'd personally go for UCL because it is infinitely better socially. UCL and all other UK universities consider our Undergraduate Preparatory Certificates (UPC) for entry to undergraduate degrees. I have difficulty in choosing offers of two programs i. LSE sucks the life out of you. UCL is perfectly good and is socially light years ahead (not something to be taken lightly either). But the difference is by two or three places, so it doesn't mean anything. This is because LSE is a '''newer' college in University of University College London (UCL) and the London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE) are both prestigious universities in London, each offering unique I also had a History offer from UCL and LSE. Social life wise from what i have heard UCL in general has a better social life and there is more to do. You could get a specialist degree classified: Politics, International History and what you can't get at UCL is to study a Anyway, UCL is almost as prestigious as LSE and there really isn’t much of a difference between the two nationally at all (LSE is definitely a bigger global brand tho). Specially between UCL and LSE. Hi everyone, I’ve just got offers from MSc Urban Development Planning at UCL (DPU) and Urbanisation and Development at LSE. LSE teaching: our School is world-renowned for teaching and research in accounting and finance and you’ll be taught by an experienced and diverse teaching team. Obviously you can't guarantee a particular experience anywhere you go but my personal experiences of anthropology at the LSE have been overwhelmingly positive. good luck with your choice, and well done on your admits! I was inspired to work in academia above legal practice. Supporting this evidence, a number of students in my school who received offers from LSE for Law did LSE strikes a balance between cost and brand recognition. LSE was founded in 1895 and is located in the heart of London. Reply 56. Forget what your parents or your teachers tell you. I really did my research and these were my reasons for choosing UCL: 1. Teaching wise I cannot say whether it is the best, but in terms of the location, theres no better place than in London, employers are minutes away from campus, this implies a (fuck ton, too much actually) lot of career events done by many firms. Founded in 1826, UCL was the first university established in London, (DPU) and Urbanisation and Development at LSE. The cost of a monthly 18+ Oyster travel card for zones 1-2 is £114. I got into UCL for econ and got rejected by LSE, I would’ve gone to LSE if I got in but I will not be attending UCL Full details of UCL's tuition fees, tuition fee policy and potential increases to fees can be found on the UCL Students website. KCL 85% LSE 82% UCL 79%-course satisfaction-How helpful lecturers are. David Cameron's old PPE tutor has transferred from Oxford to KCL. After reading your answer I’m feeling a lot less stressed about this, I think I’ll go with my gut too and accept The "big 4" (King's, UCL, LSE, Imperial) are pretty famous in Malaysia, although the older generation usually only know about Oxford or Cambridge. Spanning ancient, medieval and modern history, our History BA allows you to select modules from an extensive range of geographical regions and time periods Always keep in mind league tables are infamous for overrating and underrating certain universities, and I am VERY dubious over the fact that UCL is over-all rated better than i. That means in the former I need an A in Psychology. UCL boasts some beautiful buildings. i'd pick between the two based on specific modules on offer etc. Firstly, I rejected LSE and UCL for Warwick. You can avoid examinations altogether at UCL, but not at LSE. Warwick and UCL are the same. I think, although I went to Exeter for my undergrad and really enjoyed the small city life, I am leaning towards UCL and The funding deadline for needs-based awards from LSE: 24 April 2025. (? (other parts of my application: grades and PS are pretty good touchwood. I think I enjoy studying finance and want to pursue a career related to finance in the future, but Economics seems can provide me with a stronger numerical skill that is more suitable for future Master/PHD application in Finance, and I think UCL Economics is also a Yeah I was definitely thinking the same, I think I would make more friends at UCL than LSE. I am confident that I can achieve both offers, so the offer difficulty is not something that I will base my decision on. 0 Report. Top. It’s undeniable that both international reputation and study wise LSE is way better. LSE. MIT is great, but it is laughable to say that MIT is generally better than Yale or Harvard. Those who are blindly saying UCL "no comp", it is a stupid remark. The London School of Economics (LSE): with “E” for Economics being a key constituent of the university’s acronym, the discipline is unanimously a hallmark of LSE. You could go to the best university in Welcome to your ultimate guide to admissions at the London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE). Although I'm probably going to go with UCL anyway, for factors unrelated to reputation. 1. It would be something like this IMHO: LSE EME >> UCL MSc. Love the look of both courses, struggling to decide I'm an international student and i'm taking these factors into account: Rank, Employability, Volunteering opportunities, Internship opportunities, International reputation, possibility of acheiving good marks. UCL and LSE are close enough in the rankings that your graduate prospects won’t be significantly different, and how happy you are during your degree would have a greater impact on your outcome. 60s-90s and sciences arent niche. Both LSE and UCL are highly regarded globally for their academic excellence and research contributions. For LSE, the course is economic history (BSc) whilst UCL is for: History,Politics & Economics (BAs) at SSEES. importantly, they care loads about the ps and i feel my personal statement aligns lots with lse’s approach to law. Warwick has a fantastic reputation (on par with UCL/LSE) within the UK though, which is all that really matters if you intend to stay in the UK after uni and work here. K. Just my only insecure about UCL is about its experience on financial mathematics because I think that the course of Ms financial mathematics has been taught from 2012. While I guess LSE is more popular, UCL is ranked higher. I prefer the UCL course, as I would like The student body at UCL and LSE tends to be younger, most are straight from undergrad without much seasoning. To stand out, you’ll need AAA or higher. Overall my impression is UCL's reputation in ML/DS and the like is superior to LSE's though I think employers are generally indifferent between them. For full disclosure, I graduated from UCL (albeit ~10 years ago). You won’t find many offers below ABB at either university. As an overall university LSE is more prestigous but in History there is very little difference, and UCL is still impressive to your average person. UCL and LSE are both very popular universities. In this article, we’ll explore the key facts and statistics surrounding LSE admissions (and how hard it is to gain a place), lse pros: amazing course for law, my favourite - fits my interests and has a modern focus. Personally, I would pick politics and Econ at LSE. You should hear back from Oxbridge this week for the interview. All in all, UCL definitely won't offer anything on Further Maths and LSE is more widely known than UCL and LSE graduates earn significantly more than most UK university graduates!!! LSE History rankings The Department of International History has consistently performed well in the QS World University Rankings. UCAS's contract with universities requires that they consider all applications received before I have an undergrad offer from both UCL and LSE. So maybe the 1yr at LSE is a better deal on that front. My friends and family think I’m insane for even considering UCL over LSE but I’ve had my heart LSE for the social sciences prestige and research excellence. UCL’s main teaching locations are in zones 1 (Bloomsbury) and zones 2/3 (UCL East). 16. Reply reply UCL or LSE (Urban Development) study / academia discussion r/UCL • UCL or LSE (Urban Development) Hi everyone, I’ve just got offers from MSc Urban Development Planning at UCL (DPU) and Urbanisation and Development at LSE. Furthermore, I’m not too sure how much I want to go to uni in London so To be honest i don't see a great difference between Oxford, Cambridge, Imperial, UCL, LSE or Warwick; any of them gives you an excellent chance of getting in. manlike99. i'd probably go for lse or ucl notwithstanding the IP question. The real alternative was between LSE and UCL. QMUL responded in 2 weeks. ; Discuss the transfer with your Personal Hi everyone. You won't have a better or worse chance applying in November. Employability, International reputation, academic standards, social life etc. 2 in the UK for research power (Research Excellence Framework 2021). Best. Oxfords conditions are pretty manageable, UCLs are Past papers are available on the LSE UGAA web page. One advantage all three have is that London based academics will engage in all sorts of things beyond the University, and LSE is right by the law courts. Can you get into UCL or LSE with BBB? Unfortunately, probably not. Anonymous #2. Hi there, I am currently a third year student at LSE studying social anthropology. UCL is consistently ranked as one of the top ten universities in the world (QS World University Rankings 2010-2022) and is No. Obviously, if I actually get an LSE offer that would be insane, but I feel like UCL has a far better quality of student life. Reply 7. All sugge LSE Law is also fantastic, but UCL is regularly regarded as just a bit better. In addition to our needs-based awards, we offer scholarships for students from specific regions of the world LSE = 24% UCL = 44% For the sciences (which LSE don't offer but say if you compared UCL to ICL) the offer rates are v high for UCL. Indeed for arbitration, the classic LLMs are QMUL (London), ICAL (Stockholm) and MIDS (Geneva). Good luck with your application. Kings is worth considering, but it’s not in the same The Academic Ranking of World Universities (ARWU) uses six objective indicators to rank world universities. LSE 90% UCL 86% KCL 80%-average between how interesting and helpful lecturers were-How demanding While Cambridge, Oxford, UCL, LSE and King's - what the THE dubs the "golden triangle" in the south east of England - have remained steady in the rankings this year (UCL is down just one place with Oxford, LSE and LSE’s main USP is that it is a premier social sciences institution. Your answer was very illuminating. UCL econ department is well respected commercially and academically, but from a student perspective they arent great, slow marking, always poor From someone who studies at the LSE, you may think I’d be biased towards LSE. I’ve been told that HPE has too much of a focus on Eastern Europe, that the lectures are not that great & SSEES has a bad reputation?. Try showing your parents the league table in my previous comment. intercultural communication in UCL and Culture and conflict in a global Europe of LSE. When the student populations of the other nearby University of London colleges Ok, so I've now got an offer from both. Compared to an LSE degree in history, not its strongest subject, its a difficult choice. Career Prospects and the international prestige IMO they are very similar. 11 months ago. This is a meaningless and juvenile point. I have offers to study at LSE (3 year psychological and behavioural Sciences - new course, been running for a couple years I think since 2019, so I haven't been able to find much about it), MSci Psychology at UCL (4 year - BSc basically plus a year of applied workplace setting/research) and offer for KCL's 4 year psychology + professional placement year. I have applied for mathematics, statistics and business in LSE and arts and sciences majoring in science and engineering where I was planning on taking Econ and Maths in UCL. Waiting for Warwick. My application results are Cambridge (rejected before an interview, so sad they do not even interview me) LSE(conditional) UCL(conditional) Warwick(conditional) Durham(conditional, I applied to the natural science course and used a subsititute PS) I will choose either LSE or UCL as my firm choice, but I find it really UCL’s total student population of 43,800 students puts it at the larger end of UK universities. I wanted to work in Asia/Middle East afterwards. Relax and focus on your A-levels. University Prestige: LSE is the winner in terms of ranking and prestige, at least for investment banking recruitment, but that typically applies to the more STEM / Finance / Econs courses. Study a flexible history degree in an innovative, inclusive and supportive environment. LSE is the only uni that is somewhat in the same league as the Ivy’s & Oxbridge for the courses it teaches and it opens a lot of doors. You have to remember that LSE gets far more international applicants than UCL does for the same courses. There is also a section "How do I revise?" with a list of suggested resources on the same page. Warwick is above UCL. Therefore I’d look at where she actually would like to be in London and the vibe of the uni. UCL vs LSE vs Chicago Econ MSc I am holding offers from both UCL and LSE and am really struggling to choose between the two. Hope to receive The aim of the Economics PhD Applicant Mentoring Programme (AMP) is to help applicants from underrepresented backgrounds prepare their applications to economics PhD It won't be "less time on each module"; each module is the same amount of work (a 15 credit module at UCL is a half paper at LSE or Cambridge), you'll just be doing that work on a range of different subjects across the whole discipline of anthropology vs just doing more varied topics in the specific realm of social anthropology. Course curriculum: ucl > lse I am looking for a comprehensive course and it seems that ucl provided both social and biological anthropology, while lse only do social anthropology. Founded in 1826, UCL was the first university established in London, as well as the first in England to be entirely secular, to admit students regardless of religion, and to admit women on equal terms. We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. LSE pros: good reputation and prestige for law, has better flexibility for modules starting in 2nd year, great opportunities for career-related things ie. Hi everyone! I have received uncoditional offers from Imperial (for Maths with Stats for Finance) and from the LSE and UCL (for maths with economics) (undergrad). Whichever you go to gives you the academic side of your application full marks to put it one way. UCL or LSE (urban development) Simmisely. Some are sponsored civil servants from other countries (fast track equivalent). I was rejected from Oxbridge and accepted everywhere else. Taught and led by experts who had pioneered/ have been Why do you imply that LSE is better? This year UCL ranked 6th for law while LSE ranked 12th. Go to LSE, as you will make loads of new friends in the first year by living in superb halls of residence accommodation. lse also says it takes up to 8 weeks for them to process your application. Sent mine in on Thursday evening, I've had 3 confirmations but nothing from UCL or LSE. Which can be good or bad, depending on your time preference. Submit reply. Moreover ranking are irrelevant because of underlying methodological differences between different ranking companies e. s - My course at LSE is politics and economics) UCL or LSE (urban development) Watch. Im not planning to stay in the UK afterwards. So ask yourself, better for what? LSE often takes the lead in subject-specific rankings, particularly in social sciences. lse cons: very “corporate” environment + lots of intl students that are cliquey = poor social life. Just like Imperial, however, LSE is more specialist. I like modern history but its my least favorite if that makes sense. Related discussions. Yeah I get it - you can’t really beat UCL and LSE’s international reputations. Example: LSE is near the top 30 on the league tables, and though not top-ivy league (Yale, Columbia, Harvard, Princeton)/Oxbridge level, in the UK, many would definitely argue it excels Former LSE student here (Finance). Go look at the rankings, Warwick is always above UCL. Additional costs. UCL is ranked 8th overall compared to LSE's 49th in the QS rankings, and seems to have higher standards when selecting international students for Law than LSE-the average international student's LNAT score at LSE is 28, whereas it's 30 at UCL. Candidly, course selection doesn't count too highly in HR recruitment, at least for passing the screenings The Philosophy, Politics and Economics BSc (PPE) aims to provide breadth and depth in understanding social and political phenomena and the principles informing, and consequences following, policy choices. Also MPA is a better major in my opinion and have 2 years with one year of internship. I got an offer from LSE for Master of Public Administration and UCL for Democracy and Cooperative Science. So if Very different courses at both. Hate to be rude but LSE probably won’t look at your application based on your GCSE grades, however UCL has really been picking up steam these past few years, with the university outperforming LSE in many areas. But LSE and UCL graduates make up around 6% each of trainees in top City law firms according to a survey conducted by the Times. Hi, I am currently in a dilemma as to which university (UCL, KCL, LSE or ICL) I should take. Evidently this is a good thing, but I have been struggling to decide which program to take. LSE has the MPA for students with more experience. Its place on the league table used in this article is more modest, rounding off the top ten, but University College London gets a boost to its Oxfordliness score for being the -Employability: LSE 90% KCL 85% UCL 60% (although this seems oddly low and wouldn't trust this figure)-employment 6 months after graduation-How well the course is delivered. Personally I'd recommend LSE for Finance. I got Social and Geographic Data Science at UCL, Geographic Data Science at LSE, Environmental Data Science and Machine Learning at ICL and Sustainable Cities at KCL. I have spoken to many professors and lawyers, all of whom have suggested a preference for LSE. Thank you so much for your reply. i am very happy with UCL econ too, LSE was just always the dream :/) Share Add a Comment. I was admitted in all colleges. However LSE is not without merits, in terms of law related opportunities they have a greater focus on mooting etc. Rejected from LSE. I am a little (actually more than a little :-) ) confused as to which one should I opt for out of these Can somebody give me some pointers. Since they receive a lot of government funding, they can afford to be very selective as well. As above though it may also vary by department, and it's quite likely some individuals got offers sooner. Now, I dont neccesarily want to spend my whole life in an IB but would like to do it for 1-2 years before doing post-grad studies. In contrast, UCL covers all subjects and so naturally is worse at social sciences and sciences (generally) than I applied to LSE, UCL and other colleges. Class Programme or Route Transfer process Follow the steps below to request a Programme or Route Transfer. LSE has a better reputation, especially outside of the U. But I believe at the MIDS you can study a variety of other international dispute resolution mechanisms (WTO, even ICJ) and commercial law, and keep arbitration as a single option/module. So it's quite new and furthermore on the site UCL. While LSE is renowned for its excellence in social sciences, UCL is known for its With a proven track record of securing places at the UK’s most prestigious universities (including UCL, KCL, LSE, Imperial and Oxbridge to name just a few), we provide bespoke study skills and exam strategies, help with UCAS Hi! I have received offers from UCL, LSE and NYU. It is absolutely because it's the weekend becauseI'm assuming that those automated emails don't get sent until actual people have confirmed that they've received our applications. As well as an offer for a Bcomm in the University of Melbourne. Courses may be not sure about ucl and kcl but lse says they will start giving the first offers mid-november. I've just completed a bachelor's degree in Economics, and now I'm deciding between a MSc in Environmental Economics and Climate Change (LSE) and a MSc in Economics and Policy of Energy and Environment (UCL) The courses are quite similar: the LSE one is slightly more quantitative (which I don't mind) while the UCL one obviously gives more space to energy topics. It is the same as comparing MIT with Yale or Harvard. Hi! I am an international applicant for BSc Economics. But where I came UCL staff and students can use other, non-UCL libraries and catalogues, including where UCL has made special access arrangements with other UK institutions. A two-year program probably makes you feel more hard done by to have to do a pre-doc. Assuming thats where OP desires to seek employment, the "more impressive" nature of LSE isn't that significant at all, and shouldn't inform his/her decision. There’s a reason it is ranked last for student satisfaction (CUG rankings) every year. There's often a general student perception that KCL is a little behind UCL and LSE in general. What I have applied for both UCL and LSE and thankfully got accepted to both, however as I was not expecting it, I now am unsure as to which one to choose. I did not imply it was better full stop - i implied that it was better for getting a top job because of the reasons listed above. Both are great schools and the programs are quite similar, so I cannot decide which one I should accept. Imperial similarly does this but with science like subjects. Check here the difference based on ranking, acceptance rate, cost, admission requirements, deadline, placements,internship, scholarships, etc. Think it’s a bit biased over here in this subreddit. LSE's offers are A*AA, A* in Maths if you're doing 3. This is because LSE is a '''newer' college in University of London than UCL. But social Hey, I‘ve applied for UCL and LSE, and almost instantly got an offer from UCL. Yes, I was also surprised about KCL, no way they are more competitive than UCL or LSE, but it goes to show how random it is. They're not too fussed about Further Mathematics however it is a good advantage. If you find it difficult to Comparison between UCL UK vs LSE UK. I'm going to take one of the two Maths with economics courses but I really can't choose between the two. Would definitely recommend you look at what is involved in the different subfields and decide if you want to focus on social/cultural anthropology only or if you also want to cover biological/material culture/medical anthropology. If and when you hear back about the interview Dear all, I have applied to undertake LLM programs at LSE, UCL and KCL, and (surprisingly enough) I received offers from all 3. LSE has a better reputation than the other 2 in America, while Imperial probably has a slightly better reputation in Asia due to the engineering focus. Well, like Imperial, LSE is a specialist uni and its specialism in social sciences means naturally its funds and focus is plowed back into the social science courses etc. The employment opportunities from LSE tend to be much better, and if you don't mind the careerist culture then you would probably flourish there. So think how bad it must be if I’m telling you to go UCL. My favorite would have been ICL, but the program is way too expensive compared to the others However, UCL might have more global recognition in general as it's been ranked top 10-20 in the world for several years now. I actually know a few people who did the MPhil at Oxford and went on to amazing PhD programs, but I don't know what their median placement looks like. Oxford gives decisions in the 2nd week of January, Cambridge last week of January. I was under the impression that for economics, LSE is the best uni outside of oxbridge or relatively on par for finance based stuff and that overall LSE was slightly better than UCL- though there was not much in it. LSE specialises in Economics and the Social Sciences, with a prestigious global LSE is certainly amazing at what it specialises in, but UCL is good at just about everything and even in some of the things it overlaps with LSE in (data science, law, etc) it mostly beats/matches LSE in terms of quality (except econ/politics obviously) UCL or LSE . Undergraduate degrees | Prospective Students Undergraduate - UCL – LSE's name recognition internationally will be higher. Sir Walter Adams The London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE) is widely regarded as one of the top universities in the world, particularly in the social sciences. So I have an offer from UCL atm, and hoping probably from LSE as well soon for economics. I know that around 80% of australia's investment bankers come from Difficult but in the sense that if you put in the hard work, you will come out on top. One of my greatest mistake was not applying to Warwick and after rejected by UCL and Cambridge, Warwick is the best alternative which suggests that they are rly good. g (Actually funny to even think USC is a step up from LSE or UCL; most in the know know it is more a couple of steps down to the level of Warwick) 0 Report. As invitations to take the exam are usually received at short notice, we recommend LSE applicants familiarise themselves with the exam format once their UCAS form has been submitted in January. I’m probably biased so any advice, pros/cons, info about roi and job opportunities would be much appreciated!(p. LSE made TMUA compulsory for BsC Econ (L100) starting 2025 entry. Going over the modules, my interest has dwindled. 2 Report. Also, LSE is much better for careers, and you will be able to find research opportunities much more easily compared to UCL. For more information on additional costs for prospective students and UCL often makes offers very late in the application cycle-I got mine in May. Interestingly, Also LSE, Imperial, and UCL are all v impressive and highly regarded unis and from a reputation perspective they are pretty equally ranked. But it isn't only about academics. 1 year ago. My questions are: 1. Second, I don’t think going to UCL will stop you getting a job anywhere compared to LSE. This is quite an important factor to me. Taught out of the UCL Institute for Innovation and Public Purpose, this MPA teaches the competencies, capabilities and leadership skills needed for purpose-driven organisations in Thank you very much for your time. Review UCL’s Programme Transfer regulations (section 5 of the Academic Manual). Perception or reality or a combination does result in LSE attracting the highest average entrant grades of the 3 universities for all subjects as a whole (195). to choose the right one for In terms of rankings whilst UCL is usually equal or above to LSE, it’s usually because the rankings are skewed as LSE isn’t as broad (mainly just social sciences/business) and in these specific In my home country, LSE has a far better reputation, and it’s about 10% cheaper than UCL. LSE and UCL are both prestigious institutions in their own right. Hey, I am still wondering which program is better - Master of Social Innovation and Entrepreneurship at LSE or Master of Innovation, Entrepreneurship, and Prosperity at UCL. These indicators include the number of alumni and staff winning Nobel Prizes and Fields Medals, number of highly cited researchers selected by Thomson Scientific, number of articles published in journals of Nature and Science, number of articles indexed in Science I'd say UCL. Teaching across UCL's highly regarded Departments of Philosophy, Political Science, and Economics combines an education in social sciences and philosophy Which is more prestigious LSE or UCL? The real alternative was between LSE and UCL. UCL is great too though but has less of a prestige factor. 2. I suspect law at lse is quite small and not sure of overseas ratio. Being from Canada, I think that LSE is clearly regarded as having the better reputation of the two. But both schools would give you a good platform to enter IB or other But I've heard LSE is growing rapidly in this area of education. Going into corporate is more down to the individual at time LSE and UCL are both top unis so your career paths will be good regardless. As the UCL anthropology covers the whole range of anthropology subdisciplines (social/cultural, material If you ask around, some will say LSE (because it has a global reputation and is more well known for economics), some will say UCL (because it has a more renowned maths department in particular), but most-if not all-will say it makes very little difference which one you go to in terms of prestige. Based on a friend's application back in 2020, I think you can only expect them to get back to you after the UCAS deadline in January. I've known people who have been to each and have had a great time! Good luck with all this. Oxfordliness: 3/10. Go look at the linkedin rankings. I was wondering if anyone had any advice to help me choose! (Pros and cons all that stuff) Thanks Posted from Anecdotally I’ve seen very often that people at Imperial and LSE are less happy with their uni experiences compared to UCL due to culture and workload/expectations (don’t let this scare you but it’s my experience, go and speak to people yourself). I would say probably February/March. Hey guysss, basically I’m facing a bit of a dilemma; I find out next Monday if I get into Cambridge or not, but if I don’t, I’m not too sure if I’d rather go to LSE or UCL for Geography. @AngieRaynersDJ As buildings make little difference to employment, a casual glance at the Complete Uni guide ranks UCL at 2 and LSE at 3. If you're doing 4 subjects including Further Mathematics, the offers tend to be A*AA with a pass in the Further Maths. Some important points to be considered when applying to UCL or LSE: Unlike American universities, most UK universities do not have Early Action or Early Admission Decision pathways. Having gotten into both LSE and UCL, I would be inclined to choose LSE over UCL. good career wise. People from UCL do As a whole UCL offers this in ways that LSE can’t compete with due to the wide variety of degrees on offer. Your job prospects will be the same whether you go to UCL or LSE. This price was published by TfL in 2024. That said, LSE does have a reputation for producing more commercially and transactional minded graduates than UCL. However, I am very skeptical and want some advice. Yet in world rankings, for all subjects as a whole, UCL is ahead but next it's KCL and LSE is Applied for Ox UCL LSE KCL and QMUL last year. And agree with what the poster above said, Asians somehow regard LSE more highly for social sciences and Imperial for sciences. I just want to assure you that the department is in no way characteristically unfriendly. Posted from TSR Mobile. She was 1000% sure she would chose Warwick over LSE or any London university for undergrad, and still feels attached to Warwick while LSE is simply a bunch of buildings for her. how much bearing do each uni place on the LNAT as I am intending to score high to compensate for my "low" GCSE's (888777766666). Open comment sort options. Do remember that a First is the minimum to BCL and/or Cantab LLM. Quick Reply. In terms of LSE's diversity, your classes will in all likelihood be as you described but you can always meet people from different departments and joining societies. I chose UCL over LSE: I relied on the Times rankings, the courses on offer and the fact that several prominent lawyers and judges in my country went to UCL. LSE Library are UCL's offers are A*AA, A* in Maths (Got this this year myself). As your friend is studying economics with geography, the heavy urban/economic geography focus of the geog department at LSE is worth noting. I have conditional offers from both LSE and UCL, (A*AA for LSE, A*A*A UCL, I do Maths, Further Maths, Physics) to study Maths with Economics and Mathematics respectively. 1 Report. UCL has 190 and KCL 171. I chose the one that gave me the best opportunities for extra-curricular activities. I did my undergrad in Law at UCL and also took some classes in Philosophy at LSE as an intercollegiate. For example, i know many people say LSE and UCL are very similar, it's just LSE has a more stricter admission rate and the environment is quite lacking. Sort by: Best. This programme does not have any additional costs outside of purchasing books or stationery, printing, thesis binding or photocopying. Some may say UCL has a greater international prestige, which is probably true given their world ranking. Reply reply Internationally UCL is higher ranked as a uni and for economics. Written by Caroline Hopkinson-Woolley . So If I was in the situation I would go to UCL. If you look at Oxford Blavatnik's website, students tend to have relevant public sector work experience. London universities such as LSE imperial and UCL have better prestige than Bristol University. In the QS World University History Subject Table for 2021, History at LSE ranked 5th overall in the world for the The main difference between unis are:-LSE takes into account your first year and its worth like 1/8 of your final degree grade-LSE has better funding in regards to Bursaries and scholarships, you want to research this-UCL is regarded as more welcoming because people at LSE are highly work orientated so socialising is harder. Reply. After all LSE is literally 'The London School of Economics and Political Science' so teaching economics and politics is definitely their specialty. UCL is a better campus experience though, so both choices would be great. Wᴇʟᴄᴏᴍᴇ ᴛᴏ ʀ/SGExᴀᴍs – the largest community on reddit discussing education and student life in Singapore! SGExams is also more than a subreddit - we're a registered nonprofit that organises initiatives supporting students' academics, career guidance, mental health and holistic development, such as webinars and mentorship programmes. However, there were two things about LSE that sealed the deal for me, and I stand by them to this date. Original post by thegeek888. Not sure about LSE. My friends and family think I’m insane for even considering UCL over LSE but I’ve had my heart set on UCL for the longest time. I As for uni rankings, LSE ranks higher in UK Uni rankings and UCL ranks higher in international rankings (although this is largely due to their high weighting for science Do not get me wrong, LSE is a fantastic university; but when you compare it with UCL, I do not think that LSE would beat UCL. I have firmed UCL, because I prefer the broadness of the course much more. A great place if she were interesting in an international career, either with an international organisation or in an international firm. The worst lie anyone can tell you is that student satisfaction/social life is just about how much effort you put in. I am an australian. I applied in my late second year to (only) UCL, LSE, KCL, Cam and Oxford. 7 years ago. Brand: LSE >UCL Location: LSE > UCL Optional modules chooice: UCL>LSE Dissertation: UCL>LSE Academic staff: LSE=UCL Overall vibe of uni: UCL>LSE Facilities: LSE>UCL So in conclusion if you want prestige better go LSE, if you have a good idea of what you want to specialise in go UCL. 50. She did econ at warwick for undergrad and econ at LSE for postgrad, and knew a few people who went UCL as well. UCL is higher in the rankings, and more strict as to admission standards. -my friend goes to UCL and cannot say Overall although LSE may provide a better learning quality and career opportunities, the differences between UCL and LSE aren't massive so choosing one or the other is completely justifiable Edit: Student life is what you make of it, London in general is a large city so if you pu yourself out there then I'm sure the social life will be fine So you if want the full PPE experience LSE is probably truer to the course title. > Duke > the rest. I would need to I am currently in the process of applying to my five unis and have chosen currently kings, Cambridge, Warwick and Nottingham on basis of A*AA predictions. I've also heard KCL might not be the best for the courses that I want to do. If you're a super social person then take your choice. How is the social life at LSE compared to UCL or Warwick - will it be significantly less enjoyable? I've heard the immense work load, competitive environment, lack of community and cliqueness creates a poor student atmosphere. LSE and UCL, like most UK universities, have rolling admissions, especially for many of their When considering the question of LSE vs UCL, it’s important to realise each university shines in its own right. Yesterday, after 12 weeks, I got an offer from LSE though, and BA History at LSE is a modern international history degree, History at LSE continues to rank third, behind Oxford and Cambridge, but ahead of King's College London, UCL and I am answering this as an LSE student, but with knowledge of Warwick/UCL (from being in your position as well as friends/family) 1. Also, keep in mind that LSE and UCL are one year programs, while Duke and the others take longer. This includes Oxford, Cambridge, Imperial College London, and the London School of Economics (LSE). The background of alumni and the network resources of various business organizations of LSE are far superior to those of UCL, many decision makers, senior officials and nobles in you're right, qm does have a strong rep for ip, but is miles behind lse and ucl otherwise. e. UCL lags slightly behind because it doesnt have a clear area of excellent compared to LSE's association with economics, or Imperial's engineering and medical school. LSE is specialised in social sciences so naturally there is the perception that it is stronger than UCL in politics but I’m not sure how much that is the case. University College London (UCL). Meaning, given the fact the BCL takes in many future barristers, UCL may better support the litigious side of legal education. I cant speak for the work load of LSE past second hand information, but UCL has been perfectly manageable. But you could still get into LSE and UCL with some B grades. At my college Psychology is taught really badly-I've lost all enthusiasm for the subject, and I'd rather focus on my 3 other A-Levels and extra-curricular projects (I might well I think LSE EME dominates the rest of the list. I’m also quite tempted by LSE’s reputation but at the end of the day UCL is a top Uni as well, both choices are amazing. That means that LSE and UCL are more intense experiences. Go to LSE, as you will enjoy the experience more as an academic studying and social life is great with over 200 UCL is a great university but LSE is more like a status symbol. Really hope my study period would help me get more opportunities in finding a good job. The only thing that makes UCL more known UCL or LSE . internships LSE cons: very competitive and cut-throat culture which makes me scared ngl, apparently very cliquey??, worse social life in comparison to UCL The Society is also a good way to keep in touch with your Singaporean friends in other universities, for we often participate in inter-collegiate activities, such as the annual Singapore A comparative profile of Imperial College London, University College London (‘UCL’), King’s College London (‘KCL’), The London School of Economics and Political Science (‘LSE’) and Queen Mary University of London (‘QMUL’). Employers won't really care which one of UCL or Received offers for LSE BSc Language, Culture & Society and UCL BASc Arts and Sciences (Cultures). I don't think anyone really knows whether one university gives more attention to the personal statement, but my experience was that LSE DID give it more attention than the others: they actually came back to me about something in it that none of the Hi everyone, Firstly I thank you in advance for all the answers. uwofs ldbn itjl junqoi tjud qxqhip ihplge ypkjar mrzgc oobab